|
Ask Mike
The information contained in the ASK MIKE column is
provided for general information purposes only and is not intended to be a legal opinion
nor legal advice nor is it intended to be a complete discussion of all issued related to
the law. No attorney client relationship shall be deemed to arise hereunder. Every
individual's factual situation is different and you should seek independent legal advice
regarding specific situations. All information contained within pertains only to
California law unless otherwise noted.
Community Property
Question 1
Question 2
Question #1
Question:
I just heard that California recently passed a law that provides for something called
"community property with right of survivorship". Can you tell me a little bit
about it?
Answer:
On July 1, 2001, California Civil Code § 682.1 goes into effect, which establishes a
new form of holding title known as community property with right of survivorship. This new
form of ownership combines the survivorship rights of joint tenancy with the tax
advantages of community property, and can be used in connection with conveyance
instruments created on or after that date.
Typically, married couples will hold title either as joint tenants or as community
property. Joint tenancy is a popular device for avoiding probate, since upon the death of
one joint tenant the decedent's interest vests immediately in the survivor. There is no
need for probate, because there is nothing to pass with the decedent's estate. Recording a
simple document known as the Affidavit Death of Joint Tenant can be used to terminate the
joint tenancy.
In contrast, there is no automatic right of survivorship with community property. The
decedent's interest passes as part of his or her estate, and does not pass automatically
to the spouse. It is only when the decedent dies without a will leaving property that
would otherwise pass to his or her spouse under the laws of intestate succession, or dies
with a will leaving the property to the spouse, that community property can pass without
probate.
The main advantage to holding title as community property, however, is that upon the
death of one spouse the entire property receives a step-up in basis for tax purposes. In
contrast, if the spouses hold title as joint tenancy, only the decedent's one-half of the
property will receive the step up in basis. This can make a significant difference in tax
liability when the surviving spouse goes to sell the property.
The new community property with right of survivorship form of ownership combines the
tax advantages of community property with the survivorship rights of joint tenancy. Civ.
C. §682.1 provides that property held under this form of ownership will pass to the
survivor, without administration, subject to the "same procedures as property held in
joint tenancy". Technically, this would mean that the surviving spouse should be able
to record an Affidavit of Death of Joint Tenant, although I would suspect that this
document may be renamed when it is used to terminate title held as community property with
right of survivorship.
In order to create this new form of ownership, the deed into the husband and wife must
specifically state the vesting as "husband and wife as community property with right
of survivorship". One unusual provision of this new law, however, is that the deed
must also be signed or initialed by the husband and wife. Thus, whereas a deed usually
only requires only the signature of the grantor in order to be valid, any conveyance deed
that transfers title as "community property with right of survivorship" should
have the signatures of both the grantors, and the husband and wife as grantees.
Question #2
Question:
I appreciate your consideration in this matter. My daughter is in a predicament. She has been married for 2 years. She and her husband searched together and bought a home. They moved into the home and about 6 months later married. His grandmother co-signed and my daughter was not put on the title.
They are refinancing and signing papers this coming week. He has told her that he does not want her on the title. He wants her to sign a quitclaim. My daughter has put her own money and much work into the house. Should they divorce, does she lose all claims on the house if she signs the quitclaim?
Answer:
Simply stated, your daughter is being asked to give up her community property rights to the house. What is likely happening is that your son-in-law is refinancing the house in his name alone. In order for the title company to insure the property as being vested in his name as a married man, as his sole and separate property, it would be necessary for your daughter to sign the quitclaim deed to relinquish whatever community property rights she may have. If she does so and they later divorce, it would be extremely difficult for her to assert any interest in the property.
Before signing any quitclaim deed, I would urge your daughter to speak with a family law attorney who could advise her of the consequences in the event of a divorce.
|
Do you want to send a question to Mike?
|
|
Previous Ask Mike Answers:
|
Limited Liability Company
In recent years Limited Liability Companies (LLC) have become widely used in California. The California Limited Liability Company Act became effective September 30, 1994. The Act is found in the California Corporations Code sections 17000 through 17705. The best definition of an LLC is a hybrid of a partnership and a corporation in which the members have limited personal liability. The members of a LLC are similar to shareholders of a corporation or partners of a partnership, depending on the management structure of the LLC.
The primary reason for creating an LLC is that it combines the corporate characteristics of limited liability for all members, while permitting the members to actively and generally participate in the management and operation of the business with the benefit of "pass through" tax treatment of a partnership. The "pass through" tax treatment is considered an important advantage because earnings passed through the corporation are in effect taxed twice. First, the corporation is taxed on its own income and then when it distributes earnings to its shareholders, the shareholders are then taxed again. A properly formed LLC is not taxed as an entity but rather the members are taxed one time on the earnings from the LLC.
The LLC is formed by the filing of articles of organization by one or more members with the Secretary of State. Once the Secretary of State receives the filing, the LLC is considered formed. It is an entity capable of buying, selling and encumbering interests in real property in its own name and can be dealt with, in that capacity, much in the same manner as a corporation or partnership. In general, LLCs are formed as "member managed" or "manager managed". The type of management will be set forth in the articles of organization. When title is being insured into or out of an LLC, the Title Company will ask for a copy of the articles for examination to determine the type of management and the parties who will have authority to execute documents on behalf of the LLC.
|
|
Bankruptcy and Judgement Liens
A bankruptcy alone does not eliminate an abstract of judgement as a real property lien.
One of the most commonly misunderstood facts about bankruptcy is the effect of discharge upon judgement liens.
Common scenario:
Your seller has an abstract of judgement recorded against him, he has recorded a homestead and filed a petition for bankruptcy. The seller has listed the judgement lien creditor in the bankruptcy and an order has been entered discharging the seller from his debts.
Immediately it is believed that the debt was discharged in the bankruptcy. A debtors discharge in bankruptcy eliminates the debtors personal liability for the judgement. This means the creditor can't pursue collection from the debtor, personally, provided the judgement is a dischargeable debt, but it does not extinguish the judgement lien from the property and can be enforced by execution sale.
Under the bankruptcy code, one course of action that may be taken in order to remove the lien from said property is for the debtor to petition the court for an order "avoiding the judgement lien". If said order is granted, the judgement lien is avoided and the property on which the lien attached cannot be sold at execution sale in an enforcement of the judgement.
|
|
Mobile Housing Units and Alta Endorsement Form 7
When a lender requests insurance on property which contains a manufactured housing unit (mobile home) They often require Alta Endorsement Form 7.
This endorsement provides an insured lender with assurance that the manufactured housing unit (mobile home) located on the land is included within the policy definition of "land".
Lenders request said endorsement since Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) has indicated that it will generally accept a title policy with an ALTA Endorsement form 7 attacheä as sufficient proof that the mobilehome is real property.
The usual guidelines followed for issuing said endorsement are as follows:
First, you must determine that the mobilehome has been converted to real property pursuant to Health and Safety Code 18851 and the record reflects the existence of a Health and Safety Department (HSD) document in compliance therewith, describing the real property, the name of the owner(s) of the real property, and stating that a particular mobilehome has been affixed thereto.
Second, an inspection of said property must be made confirming the foregoing.
Third, determine the mobilehome is free and clear of personal property liens.
Fourth, determine that mechanics lien priority is not an issue.
Fifth, determine that the lender's mortgage ( or other loan documentation) identifies the mobilehome with sufficient particularity.
Generally, there is no charge for issuing said endorsement.
|
|
Facts About Bankruptcy
Many times the subject of bankruptcy seems baffling in its complexity. Actually the basic principals of bankruptcy are fairly simple even though the federal status on bankruptcy are extensive. The reason that the statutes are so complex is because in as effort at social engineering, the lawmakers want to cover every possible contingency. The very complexity of the Bankruptcy Code gives the lawyers ample opportunity to try to obtain interpretation of the law which best serves their clients interest. This results in extensive litigation and occasionally in interpretations of the Code which were not what legislature intended. This on turn results in additional legislation, which results in additional litigation and on and on. Nevertheless, the underlying principals are not as complex as the Code makes them seem. Here we will discuss the personal nature of bankruptcy.
The concept of bankruptcy is an old one in the English common law. If a person could not pay his debts, his creditors hauled him into court, took all of his assets, and used those assets to satisfy their debts. If the assets were insufficient to satisfy the debts, the debtor was taken from the bankruptcy court to debtors prison. Since this is a rather extreme remedy, Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives the Congress the right to establish "….uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States."
As the popularity of debtors prison declined, the concept of giving the debtor a fresh start became one of the primary purposes of the bankruptcy process. It is important to remember that a bankruptcy is a personal action which at time of discharge gives the petitioner (formerly the debtor) a fresh start. The property owned by the petitioner does not get the fresh start, the individual does.
The fact that bankruptcy is a personal action may shed some light on the effect of a homestead in a bankruptcy proceeding. The bankruptcy code acknowledges the validity of homesteads. A homestead is a personal exemption which, in an effort to preserve a person's home, protects a certain amount of an individual's equity in the homestead property. State law determines the extent and effect of a homestead. Thus, if state law says that a person can declare a homestead up to $75,000 and if there is less than $75,000 equity in the property, that equity in the property, that equity is protected by the homestead. This principal operates without regard to the Federal Bankruptcy Code.
|
|
Differences in Types of Bankruptcy
When a petition for bankruptcy is filed, it is as if the petitioner is saying to the bankruptcy court, "Here are all of my possessions, you figure it out." This is called a chapter 7 bankruptcy. (Chapter 11 and Chapter 13 bankruptcies involve the petitioner creating a plan to pay the creditor's back, and are a different breed of cat.) A trustee is appointed to represent the petitioners creditors and divvy up the petitioners assets among those creditors. If a states homestead law says that a certain amount of the petitioner's equity in his home cannot be used to satisfy certain debts, the trustee cannot use that equity to pay off creditors. The court is in no better position than the creditors would be. Thus, when the trustee allows the exemption of the petitioner's property, the trustee is saying that whatever equity the petitioner has in his home is protected by the petitioners declaration of homestead. If state law allows a $75,000 homestead, the exemption is $75,000. If the state has a $50,000 limit, the exemption is limited to $50,000 and so on.
The trustee also has the right to determine that a piece of property has too many liens or encumbrances. In this case, the trustee can abandon the property. If the property is exempt or abandoned, it is no longer subject to the bankruptcy, although the petitioner may still benefit from the protection of the automatic stay which prevents anyone from bringing an action against a petitioner while the bankruptcy proceeding is pending.
After the petitioner's property has been divided among the petitioner's creditors, and those debts which can be satisfied have been satisfied, the petitioner is discharged. This means that the creditors cannot look to the petitioner for payment of any remaining debts. This discharge of the petitioner has nothing to do with the petitioner's property. State law determines the effect of any liens recorded against the petitioners property.
The effect of all this is that if property is deemed exempt or abandoned or if the petitioner is discharged and retains title to the property, any recorded liens are still attached to the property and must be reckoned with. In most instances whatever equity the petitioner has in the property will be protected by the declaration of homestead. Had the equity exceeded the amount of equity protected by the homestead, the trustee would have probably used it to satisfy the creditors. Excess equity (or property upon which a homestead cannot be declared) is the usual reason that the trustee will ask the court to authorize the sale of the property free and clear of existing liens. The free and clear part is intended to make the property more attractive to a potential buyer, assuring the highest price and getting the most money to satisfy the greatest number of creditors.
Remember, a bankruptcy relieves the discharged petitioner of his debts. It has no effect on the petitioner's property. Unless the bankruptcy court decides otherwise and issues an order removing the lien of existing encumbrances, the property is still subject to the effect or recorded liens under state law.
|
|
Civil Code 1183 Compliance
Frequent inquiries are made regarding necessary procedures to be followed , to comply
with California Civil Code 1183, when an acknowledgment of an instrument is taken outside
the United States.
The code section provides that the following officers may take acknowledgment outside
the United States:
a. A Minister, Commissioner, or Charge d' affaires of the United States.
b. A Consul, Vice consul, or Consular Agent of the United States.
c. A Judge of a Court of Record of the Country where the proof or acknowledgment is
made.
d. Commissioners appointed by the Governor or Secretary of State for that purpose.
e. A Notary Public.
For the purpose of assuring that California County Recorders
will accept the documents upon which the acknowledgments appear for recording, one should
be aware that use of the Official set forth in (a) and (b) is the most certain manner in
which to proceed. The use of a Foreign Notary Public can present special problems since
the signature of that notary public must be proved or acknowledged by:
(1) A Judge of a Court of record of the country where the proof or acknowledgment is
made.
(2) Any American Diplomatic Officer, Consul General, Consul, Vice Consul, or Consular
Agent.
(3) By an apostille (certification) affixed
to the instrument pursuant to the terms of the Hague Convention abolishing the requirement
of legalization for foreign public documents.
Of the three prove-up methods, (3) is the most
practical and reliable. Nations who are members of the Hague Treaty are Countries from
which an apostille will be acceptable. The Apostille must be made in the Country where the
proof or acknowledgment was made, by an authority designated to do so by that Country.
|
|
The Lis Pendens Explained
The Lis Pendens
A Lis Pendens gives constructive notice of a pending lawsuit relating to real property
or affecting the title or the right of possession of real property.
The notice is recorded in the County Recorders Office in which the property is located
at the time the complaint or cross complaint if filed, or at any time thereafter. Once
recorded the Lis Pendens imparts constructive notice not only of its contents (provided it
meets statutory requirements) but also of facts concerning the action that could be
discovered by reasonable inquiry.
A Lis Pendens creates a cloud on title which could render the property unmarketable.
Said Lis Pendens remains as long as the action is pending, unless it is voluntarily
withdrawn or expunged (wipe out - erase) by motion to the court. Caution should still be
used even if the Lis Pendens is not removed since danger may still exist for a Title
Company.
The grounds for expungement include the following:
1) Underlying action does not Affect t title to or the right to possession to the real
property described in the notice, or
2) the lawsuit was not commenced, or is not being prosecuted for a proper purpose and
in good faith.
The court may also order the expungement, even if they decide the real property claim
is probably valid, if the court decides that adequate relief can be secured by posting a
bond an amount sufficient to indemnify the claimant against all resulting damages from
removing the Lis Pendens.
If a motion to expunge is granted, a certified copy of an order expunging the Lis
Pendens may not be recorded, until the period of time of filiing a petition for review by
the court of appeals., has expired.
|
|
|