OCT Main Our Columnists What's Hot and What's Not Saturday March 13th 2010
Print Page Send this page to a friend! Comment on this page Make this page your home page

Mission Statement
About OCT
Company Directory
Consumer Information
Title Advantage
Online Rate Quote
Real Estate Services
Builder Services
Commercial Services
OCT Lender Services
Escrow Services
Default Services
Transaction Management
Laureltree Promotions
Our Columnists
News Items
Help
Web Site Map
Search Site

Site Awards
Real Estate Library
Pure Gold
RealtyTrac
Top 20
REALS
Award Winner
Z-LAW
Editor's Choice


What's Hot and What's Not


Volume 10 Issue 5
May 2005


By:
U.S. Senator John Seymour (ret.)


NATIONAL ECONOMY: The primary economic indicator, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rose a somewhat "timid" 3.1% during the first quarter of this year. Expectations had been for a much stronger 3.5% to 4.0% increase. The original projections for GDP growth in 2005 of 4% to 5% have now been tempered to 3.5% to 4%. The new jobs numbers for April were heartening. Expectations had been for 175,000 new jobs to be created and according to the U.S. Department of Labor, 274,000 new jobs were actually delivered. The monthly new jobs numbers have been somewhat of an enigma over the last twelve months. There have been just as many months in which the new jobs numbers have been below expectations as there has been months when expectations have been exceeded. The average monthly new jobs created in the U.S. over the last year have been 181,000. Historically, during an economic recovery cycle, new jobs have grown at a rate of 200,000 to 300,000 per month. The national unemployment rate remained unchanged in April at 5.2%. According to the much-watched Institute For Supply Management Index (ISM), economic activity has slowed. Their manufacturing index for April was 53.3. That's down from 55.2 in March. Any index reading above 50 is considered to reflect positive economic growth, while any index reading below 50 is considered to reflect a contracting economy. According to Norbert J. Ore, Chair of the ISM, "In April, the manufacturing sector grew for the 23rd consecutive month. This represents the longest period of growth in the last 16 years. However, the rate of growth slowed to its lowest level since July 2003. A majority of the components that make up the Index have slowed. New orders are down 3.4%. Supplier Deliveries are down 1%. Inventories are down 6.2%. Backlog of Orders is down 3%. The Consumer Confidence Index dropped 5.3 points to 97.7 in April. That's down from 103.0 in the preceding month. On the inflation front, the GDP implicit price deflator rose from 2.7 to 3.2, suggesting that inflation risks during the first quarter were slightly higher. The Consumer Price Index (CPI), the most widely used measure of inflation edged upward in its most recent release, but the annualized change of the core index, which strips away more volatile food and energy costs, actually dropped a tenth of a point to an annualized 2.2%. This reinforces the notion that it is primarily energy costs that have been placing some upward pressure on inflation. So, what's going on with this economy and what can we expect? I believe a lot depends upon the actions of the Federal Reserve over the next few months.

THE FED WATCH & MORTGAGE RATES: Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and his Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) raised the Fed Funds Rate one-quarter of a percent to 3%. This was the eighth 25 basis point increase in as many meetings since June of 2004. This latest increase represents a continuation of the FED's "measured" interest rate increase strategy. In their statement accompanying the rate increase, the FED said "The Committee believes that, even after this action, the stance of monetary policy remains accommodative and, coupled with robust underlying growth in productivity, is providing ongoing support to economic activity. Recent data suggest that the solid pace of spending growth has slowed somewhat, partly in response to the earlier increases in energy prices. Labor market conditions, however, apparently continue to improve gradually. Pressures on inflation have picked up in recent months and pricing power is more evident. Longer-term inflation expectations remain well contained." Translated, Guru Greenspan and his merry band of interest rate setters believe that inflation poses a greater threat than a slowing economy and anticipate a continuation of tightening the interest rate thumbscrews. I believe that Greenspan is playing a very dangerous game of "chicken." His aggressive rate increases, if continued, could well send our "slowing" economy into a "stall". The facts are that virtually all recessions since World War II have been preceded by FED interest rate hikes. The growth in the monthly new job numbers has been erratic at best. Business and industry thrives best when they have a "stable" and "predictable" economic environment. A continuation of rising interest rates is anything but stable and a "yo-yo" new jobs barometer is anything but predictable. In my opinion, the good Dr. Greenspan needs to "back-off." The inflation we have is minimal and although the energy price bubble hasn't burst, crude oil certainly does not seem to be headed for $60 per barrel. Let the laws of supply and demand set prices for a few months and keep the FEDs big nose out of the economy. Long-term rates and mortgage rates have remained consistently low despite the short-term rate increase antics of our FED Chief. When asked during a recent Congressional hearing why long-term rates haven't risen with short-term rates, Dr. Greenspan answered, "it is a conundrum." In the past, the long-term rates would respond to the FEDs short-term rate hikes and curb economic expansion. Not so this time - so far. The difference between then and now is that China, Japan, and South Korea have been "propping up" our economy so that our consumers continue to buy their goods. With those foreign countries and others buying our U.S. Treasury securities, the 10-year Treasury Note, which is the benchmark for setting mortgage rates, has remained under 4.5% and that in turn provides a 30-year fixed rate mortgage under 6%. According to Grant's Interest Rate Observer newsletter this week, foreign banks had increased their holdings of U.S. debt securities by 63% since 2003 and now hold more than the FED itself holds. If for any reason, the foreign banks were to start selling the U.S. Treasury Securities, mortgage rates would jump anywhere from 50 to 100 basis points almost overnight. That in turn would have a very negative effect on home sales and homebuilding. However, if our economy was growing at a faster rate and jobs were being created at 300,000 to 400,000 per month, our long-term rates would not be at the mercy of foreign countries and their banks. In the meantime, if Guru Greenspan would leave his hands off the interest rate throttle, business and industry would become more aggressive and begin growing some real job numbers. Stay Tuned. Freddie Mac reported last Thursday that the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 5.77%. That's up from 5.75% one week earlier. Given the current course of economic events, we can expect the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage to be 6.5% by the end of this year and closing in on 7% by next spring.

FEDERAL TAX REFORM & SENATE FILIBUSTERS: The Presidential Commission studying federal tax laws will soon complete its work and assumedly will make recommendations to the President and Congress. In a previous newsletter, I have expressed my concern that under the guise of tax reform, home mortgage interest deductibility and other real estate tax benefits might be at risk. Last week President Bush, in a speech before the National Association of Realtors (NAR), gave us a sigh of relief when he promised that home mortgage interest deductibility was off the table when it comes to tax reform. I wish that he had gone further and said the same for capital gains for home sales and State and local property tax deductions. However, I guess we need to take it one step at a time. Mortgage interest deduction is worth about $76 billion per year. Capital gains tax break for home sales represents $36.3 billion per year, and State and local property tax deductions accounts for $14.8 billion. Even to the most liberal tax spenders in Congress $127.1 billion, which is the total of homeownership benefits under current federal tax law, is a lot of money going to "rich" homeowners that they would like to "re-distribute." NAR will keep a close eye on this issue as it progresses. By the way, if you're the average American, you stopped working for the Federal Government this year on April 17th. According to The Tax Foundation, the average American paid our Federal government taxes amounting to 70 days worth of work this year, and also paid State and local taxes amounting to an additional 37 days of work. If you're not "average" you're still working for the government. Whether or not you're average, are you getting your money's worth? If the government does too much more for me, I'll need a night job in order to pay for all of it. What's all the commotion about over the "filibuster" rule in the U.S. Senate? Under Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of our Federal Constitution, the President has the power to nominate and with the Advise and Consent of the Senate, appoint federal judges, including those to the U.S. Supreme Court. Under Article I, Section 5, Clause 2, of the Constitution, each house shall determine the Rule of its Proceedings. The Senate rule of filibustering originally had no limits as was agreed to by a majority of Senators at the time. In 1917, the Senate changed the filibuster rule to require 67 of the 100 Senators to vote in order to end a filibuster. In 1975, under Democratic leadership, the filibuster rule was changed to require only 60 votes. Now the Republicans want to lower the vote on filibuster for "judicial" appointments only, to 51 votes, a simple majority of the 100 Senators. Beyond the bluster and blather of political rhetoric, the Democrats with a 60-vote requirement can prevent any vote, AYE or NAY, on any Presidential nomination thereby abdicating their "Advise & Consent" responsibility. What is wrong with a simple majority vote? Let the chips, or in this case, the votes fall where they may. Having served in that august body and personally filibustered I know, first hand, how important history and tradition are to the Senate; however, when arcane rules are used to disrupt and dismember majority rule, the majority needs to change the rules. Believe me, if Senators Ted Kennedy (D-Mass) and Chuck Shumer (D-NY) were faced with a similar situation, they would have changed the Senate rules before you could say f-i-l-i-b-u-s-t-e-r…

NATIONAL REAL ESTATE: Sales of newly built single-family homes rose by 12.2% in March compared to the previous month, and hit an all-time high seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.43 million units according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. At the current sales pace unsold inventories of single-family homes represent a low 3.6 months supply. Regionally, only the Northeast saw a decline of sales by 9%. Sales gained 22% in the Midwest, 13.8% in the South and 10% in the West. Existing-home sales increased by 1% in March compared to February, and were the third highest sales record in history. Total housing inventories fell 0.2% at the end of March and represent a four months supply. The median price of an existing-home rose to $195,000 in March and was up 11.4% from March of 2004. Regionally, the Northeast sales of existing-homes stayed even. In the West, sales increased 1.9%. In the South they rose 0.4% and in the Midwest, sales were up 2%. The NAR's Pending Home Sales Index (PHSI) which projects closed sales 60 days later was 122.8, which is 0.3% below the PHSI of February. NAR and its over one million members are facing another antitrust lawsuit by the U.S. Department of Justice. For decades the U. S. Attorney General and the Department of Justice have claimed that NAR's multiple listing services are in violation of anti-trust laws and that the multiple listing service is a "public" property. In each case NAR, with minor changes to its multiple listing rules has prevailed. The most recent case has to do with the multiple listing services of NAR on the internet. The Department of Justice makes the same claims of anti-trust. NAR defends their members by saying that the internet service is a proprietary right of Realtors and that Realtors can pick and choose those members with whom they want to share information. In order to avoid the action of the Department of Justice, NAR has agreed to change the rule so that the Realtor can choose to share their listing information with all members or none of them; however, they will not be able to pick and choose with whom they would share listing information.

CALIFORNIA ECONOMY: As of this writing the State Economic and Development Department has not published April's new job numbers; however, I would expect that California created approximately 25,000 to 30,000 new jobs in April and that the State's unemployment rate has remained relatively unchanged at 5.4%. The U.S. Department of Defense just released its recommended military base closures and changes that could have a major effect on California jobs. Expectations had been for some major base closings and substantial layoffs. California currently has 30 major military installations with a total of 93,500 jobs at risk and $10 billion in annual revenues to the general economy. The recommendations of the Base Realignment and Closure Commission (BRAC) must be reviewed by the President and approved by the Congress; however, at this point BRAC's recommendations would result in the loss of less than 3,000 military personnel and 5,700 civilian jobs. Some California communities have been "on the edge" regards some potential major job losses. Yuba County with Beale Air Force Base and 6,000 jobs at risk is breathing easier since BRAC has seen fit to keep Beale active. Riverside and San Bernardino counties had lost over 10,000 jobs with the closure of Norton Air Force Base and more than 4,000 jobs when March air Force Base shifted to reserve status in the last round of base closures. In this round, it would appear that they could lose 3,500 military and related civilian jobs worth about $308 million per year according to Inland Economist John Husing. The economic loss is minor compared to the $3.1 billion per year loss when Norton and March were closed. Total military job losses in San Diego County are estimated at 404 out of more than a potential of 50,000. 144 jobs will be lost at Camp Pendleton; however Miramar Air Station will pickup 72 new jobs. All in all, California did extremely well in surviving the military base closures and realignments. Population growth in California last year was up 1.5%, adding 539,000 new residents. California now represents 12% of the nation's population for a total of 36.8 million residents. Counties of note have grown as follows: Contra Costa 1.2%, El Dorado 1.7%, Los Angeles 1.2%, Nevada 1.2%, Orange 1.1%, Placer 3.1%, Riverside 3.8%, Sacramento 1.8%, San Bernardino 2.5%, San Diego 1.3%, San Joaquin 2.7% Yolo 1.7%, and Yuba 2.5%. Among the larger cities Sacramento grew the fastest at 1.9% while San Jose grew 1.5% and Fresno at 1.4%. Among the fastest growing small cities were Indio, Palm Desert, La Quinta, Victorville and Beaumont.

CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE: New housing starts rebounded nicely in March from a rain-soaked February. New residential building permits issued in March totaled 19,157, that's up 33.3% compared to the previous month according to the California Building Industry Association (CBIA). Of the total, 14,136 were for single-family homes and 5,021 were multi-family units. Expectations are for another 200,000 housing units to be built this year. Existing-home sales rose 7.5% during March compared to one year ago. The median price showed a continuing pattern of slowing with a 15.7% increase compared to March of 2004. Year to date sales are 6% ahead of last year's pace according to Leslie Appleton-Young, Chief Economist for the California Association of Realtors (CAR). Regionally, March sales in Los Angeles County were up 12.9% compared to March of 2004, up 18.7% in Orange County, up 11.1% in the Inland Empire, up 1.7% in Sacramento, down 5.9% in San Diego and down 4.6% in the San Francisco Bay Area. According to Data Quick's reported April sales of homes in Southern California and the Bay Area, Los Angeles County sales were down 4.2% compared to March and the median price was up 15.5% compared to April of 2004. In Orange County, sales were down 0.7% and the median price was up 10.1%. San Diego County reported sales down 12.3% and the median price up 10.3%. Riverside County had sales down 6.5% and the median price up 21.4%. San Bernardino County had sales up 1.3% and the median price up 32.8%. In Contra Costa County sales were off 12.4% and the median price was up 22.7%. San Mateo County had sales off 1.3% and the median price was up 19.8% The Bay Area reported sales down 10.2% and the median price was up 19.1% Of the 20 "hottest" housing markets in the nation, four were in California according to an NAR survey. California's hottest markets were Riverside/San Bernardino followed by Sacramento, Los Angeles and San Diego.

This newsletter is published by Orange Coast Title for the benefit of its customers and those of its affiliates, California Title and Equity Title. Ask your Title Representative for a monthly copy, free of charge, and while you're at it, try our title services. We appreciate your title business and we'll do whatever it takes to earn and keep your business.

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and, are not in any way, to be attributed to the employees or management of Orange Coast Title or their affiliates. Comments, criticism, or opposing views are all welcome at jfseymour@aol.com..

Sources: LA Times, Wall Street Journal, Desert Sun, The California Kiplinger Letter, DataQuick News, NAR, CAR, NAHB, MBS, CBIA, National Mortgage News, OC Register, San Diego Daily Transcript, Sacramento Bee and Barrons


Orange Coast Title Company First Centennial Title Company of Nevada California Title Company Equity Title Agency JLM Corporation Real Advantage NAMG Integrated Lender Services

Top of Page | Top of Site Orange Coast Title - 640 N. Tustin Ave. - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - (714) 558-2836